Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Date: 2010-10-04 17:50:29
Message-ID: AANLkTi=9RYk5YNbuJ5mW44WHTz6_S0ghy=8pWhJ5fd0E@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On 4 October 2010 18:32, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>>>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located.  Previously
>>>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index.  I also
>>>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>>>> as per this discussion:
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>>>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>>>>
>>>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>>>> unsorted function tables.
>>>
>>> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
>>
>> Is this on the radar?  Copying in -hackers in case.
>
> I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit
> without more scrutiny than I had time to give it.  Perhaps it would be
> useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the
> next CF.

Thanks Robert.  I'll probably submit it for the next commitfest then :)

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-10-05 08:58:24
Subject: no documentation for (compval).* field selection
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-04 17:32:34
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dan PortsDate: 2010-10-04 17:55:45
Subject: Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-04 17:47:48
Subject: Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group