| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not |
| Date: | 2011-03-11 13:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=33rx8X90+SV-kSW0GOObt=6Ne9OqkEXc6HHB6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not the
>> > FREEZE functionality.
>>
>> The text you added here is flat-out wrong (you used "unparenthesized"
>> in both halves of the sentence), and it's also not as clear as the
>> text it replaced. I'd suggest reverting this, and instead adding a
>> sentence that says simply:
>>
>> The unparenthesized syntax is deprecated.
>
> Fixed. Other changes? I didn't like the original sentence because it
> started by mentioning 9.0 rather than the syntax itself.
Hmm, well I don't know. I thought the original phrasing was clearer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 13:18:16 | pgsql: Improve extract(day) documentation with interval values. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 12:58:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-11 13:14:22 | Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-11 13:02:25 | Re: Sync Rep v19 |