On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not the
>> > FREEZE functionality.
>> The text you added here is flat-out wrong (you used "unparenthesized"
>> in both halves of the sentence), and it's also not as clear as the
>> text it replaced. I'd suggest reverting this, and instead adding a
>> sentence that says simply:
>> The unparenthesized syntax is deprecated.
> Fixed. Other changes? I didn't like the original sentence because it
> started by mentioning 9.0 rather than the syntax itself.
Hmm, well I don't know. I thought the original phrasing was clearer.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-11 13:14:22|
|Subject: Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-11 13:02:25|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-03-11 13:18:16|
|Subject: pgsql: Improve extract(day) documentation with interval values.|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-03-11 12:58:45|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized
VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not|