| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication server timeout patch |
| Date: | 2011-02-28 13:08:12 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=1==D7kMFc2WWL_75kYrWzw8ZZoZ_Rn-aVL3Tc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> There are two things that I think are pretty clear. If the receiver
>> has wal_receiver_status_interval=0, then we should ignore
>> replication_timeout for that connection.
>
> The patch still doesn't check that wal_receiver_status_interval
> is set up properly. I'll implement that later.
Done. I attached the updated patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| replication_timeout_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 38.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-02-28 13:54:11 | Bug of the hot standby feedback |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-02-28 12:27:08 | Re: PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls |