On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> There are two things that I think are pretty clear. If the receiver
>> has wal_receiver_status_interval=0, then we should ignore
>> replication_timeout for that connection.
> The patch still doesn't check that wal_receiver_status_interval
> is set up properly. I'll implement that later.
Done. I attached the updated patch.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-02-28 13:54:11|
|Subject: Bug of the hot standby feedback|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-02-28 12:27:08|
|Subject: Re: PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls|