Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication server timeout patch

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication server timeout patch
Date: 2011-02-28 13:08:12
Message-ID: AANLkTi=1==D7kMFc2WWL_75kYrWzw8ZZoZ_Rn-aVL3Tc@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> There are two things that I think are pretty clear.  If the receiver
>> has wal_receiver_status_interval=0, then we should ignore
>> replication_timeout for that connection.
>
> The patch still doesn't check that wal_receiver_status_interval
> is set up properly. I'll implement that later.

Done. I attached the updated patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: replication_timeout_v3.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (38.8 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-02-28 13:54:11
Subject: Bug of the hot standby feedback
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2011-02-28 12:27:08
Subject: Re: PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group