Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Date: 2010-09-29 01:11:00
Message-ID: AANLkTi=0n_sbZ0XzfU2n-FCMeVaiddWT_hwK0oy3u0Te@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> The Good:
> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.

As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
"A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for several weeks "
in 9.0 development.

Do we have any plans for it? According to the commitfest app, one patch
has only one reviewer at once. A new reviewer might avoid reviewing
a patch that have another reviewer already.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-09-29 01:16:08
Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
Previous:From: Itagaki TakahiroDate: 2010-09-28 23:51:54
Subject: Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-29 01:18:27
Subject: Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2010-09-28 21:03:15
Subject: Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-29 01:18:27
Subject: Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Previous:From: Christian RamseyerDate: 2010-09-29 01:08:07
Subject: FTS GIN Index Question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group