On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> The Good:
> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.

As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
"A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for several weeks "
in 9.0 development.

Do we have any plans for it? According to the commitfest app, one patch
has only one reviewer at once. A new reviewer might avoid reviewing
a patch that have another reviewer already.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

• Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly at 2010-09-28 21:03:15 from David Fetter

Responses

• Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly at 2010-09-29 01:18:27 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2010-09-29 01:16:08
	Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
Previous:	From: Itagaki Takahiro	Date: 2010-09-28 23:51:54
	Subject: Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-09-29 01:18:27
	Subject: Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Previous:	From: David Fetter	Date: 2010-09-28 21:03:15
	Subject: Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-09-29 01:18:27
	Subject: Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Previous:	From: Christian Ramseyer	Date: 2010-09-29 01:08:07
	Subject: FTS GIN Index Question