On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>> What about the messages in configure?
>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>> from CVS nor"
> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
different version :-)
I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
I'll go look at backporting it soon.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-09-22 14:10:13|
|Subject: Re: CVS in docs|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-22 13:46:46|
|Subject: Re: CVS in docs |