From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS in docs |
Date: | 2010-09-22 14:07:22 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=0_ctB7Cr2E6Xy6PE=+KoaqnB8h576+u=xo05M@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>
>> Agreed.
>
>> What about the messages in configure?
>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>> from CVS nor"
>
> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
different version :-)
I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
I'll go look at backporting it soon.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-22 14:10:13 | Re: CVS in docs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 13:46:46 | Re: CVS in docs |