| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2010-08-19 01:27:54 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=-gbchU1LUNe-OCBBr4mGQc2gEZR3h7grd-M7=@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/16/10 5:46 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I don't really think that pg_upgrade should be recommended for 8.3 to
>>> 8.4 upgrades. There are too many limitations and it's not been well
>>> tested. I don't even trust it very much yet for 8.4 to 9.0 updates...
>
> It's actually pretty well tested for to 9.0. A lot of the beta-testers
> have been using it.
Beta testers are one thing; large numbers of production users are
something else again. I believe it's better tested this time than it
was last time around, but I wouldn't be prepared to bet against us
finding more bugs.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-19 17:43:49 | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-18 22:06:32 | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |