Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?
Date: 2010-12-11 12:47:38
Message-ID: AANLkTi=-AKX7_WJ2z4dJ0X0nLmJAH_+ZsyD0Jcjhpa6n@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 23:55, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 00:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Why is there documentation for "PostgreSQL 9", here:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html
>>
>> 9.0 also exists, but this came up first in Google.  Isn't this prone to
>> create confusion about the version numbering?
>
> Yes I would think so.

Indeed.

Where did you find a link to "9"? It should really only show up as
such if there's a link on our site to it somewhere, and I can't find
it - and thus cna't remove it...b

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-11 17:09:04 Re: URL alias for License
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-10 22:55:26 Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?