Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] pgAdmin 6.4.3 Released

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Ken J(dot) Wright'" <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] pgAdmin 6.4.3 Released
Date: 1999-02-22 10:45:44
Message-ID: AA5E228994ABD21189C8006097BCD3D625CA@woody.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken J. Wright [mailto:ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com]
> Sent: 19 February 1999 18:36
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pgAdmin 6.4.3 Released
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Is it possible to have a stipped down version of the
> download? Having to
> pull down 4+mb via a modem each time is rather painful. I'm
> not sure what
> all the .cap file contains, but the executable is only 600+kb. After
> installing the first time, all the other m$ stuff should be
> ok?

I used to do this with the 6.3.x series. Unfortunately it's not as straight
forward as you might think, because there are about 6 custom ocx's in the
package that often get updated as well - which require registration - as
well as new versions of the runtimes when service packs are released.

The best way to go about it might be to produce an update containing only
the files updated since the previous release. This has two drawbacks:

1) Relies on the user to extract the files to the correct place and manually
register them where necessary.

2) Will only allow (in some cases) upgrading from the immediately previous
version.

If we can get some thoughts from other users about the best way to go I'll
start to do this.

>BTW, *very*
> nice tool. The table viewer is most useful, but you know what
> is next. If
> we could just edit those values.....nothing fancy, just basic table
> maintenance. Then I could use just one tool ;-)

Thanks. When you say 'edit those values' do you mean the table data or the
table info (NO. Triggers, Has Indexes etc.)? If you mean the former, we do
have a nice data control that we could use - I'll look into it. If you mean
the latter then my advice is that you almost certainly don't want to be
playing with those values!

Regards,

Dave.


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Anatoly K. LasareffDate: 1999-02-22 11:53:04
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Tables names from query
Previous:From: Philip ShielsDate: 1999-02-22 10:36:59
Subject: Tables names from query

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group