Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Explain Nodes

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explain Nodes
Date: 2011-04-28 22:41:44
Message-ID: A9B2D05F-8491-4308-83D1-2E621E17681F@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> It's been pointed out before that plugins (like FDWs) can invent their own explain nodes, so we'll never have a canonical list of such nodes.

Oh, interesting. Stil, a list of core nodes is a good 90% solution, IMHO.

Best,

David


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2011-04-29 00:14:16
Subject: Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-04-28 22:40:04
Subject: Re: Explain Nodes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group