Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions
Date: 2009-05-29 22:03:30
Message-ID: A8DE9872-485C-4C30-B5C3-19653E7AEF96@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 29, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:

> a) the ability to "push" a schema onto the current search path
> b) the ability to "pull" a schema off the current search path

push, pop, shift, unshift. :-)

Come to think of it, I want these for arrays, too. ;-)

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-05-29 22:05:48
Subject: Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2009-05-29 22:01:11
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group