Re: Should array_length() Return NULL

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL
Date: 2013-03-15 23:06:38
Message-ID: A7FB8F72-9D87-4314-B359-5874215EBB2B@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 15, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>> Oh. Is there a way to declare an empty 1-dimension array?
>
> Doesn't look like it:
>
> regression=# select '[1:0]={}'::text[];
> ERROR: upper bound cannot be less than lower bound
> LINE 1: select '[1:0]={}'::text[];
> ^
>
> Possibly we should allow that, but just as with the other point, it
> would require some thought and investigation to make sure we weren't
> creating more problems than we solved.

Right, okay. I added a link to your email to https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Arrays. Looks like better dealing with empty arrays was already on the list, including this gem:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28026.1224611437@sss.pgh.pa.us

Thanks,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-16 01:16:53 Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-03-15 22:59:07 Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)