Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
Date: 2003-11-20 16:28:58
Message-ID: A466DF00-1B76-11D8-8C54-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 05:21 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> This is most certainly the stylesheet as the SGML docs use tags that we
> don't use elsewhere. Any volunteers to figure out what they are and 
> make
> them look purdy?

I'm not sure what's causing the two docs (developer and current) to 
render differently. AFAICT, there's no special CSS to handle the 
particular tags that are rendering differently.

Be that as it may, if you drop this into the postgresql.css, it should 
make things match. I'd still like to get rid of the monospaced italics, 
but for the time being I think it might be best to go with what the 
conventions describe. We can always change it later.

Michael

ACRONYM.ACRONYM { font-style:normal; }

CODE.FUNCTION,
VAR.LITERAL,
VAR.PARAMETER,
VAR.REPLACEABLE {
     font-family:monospace;
     font-style:normal;
     font-size:small;
     voice-family: "\";}\""; /* Tantek MSIE4/5 hack */
     voice-family:inherit;
     font-size:medium;
}

VAR.PARAMETER,
VAR.REPLACEABLE {
     font-style:italic;
}


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-20 16:36:19
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-11-20 16:24:24
Subject: Re: New Event

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group