Re: No ~ operator for box, point

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No ~ operator for box, point
Date: 2007-01-26 21:14:55
Message-ID: A16447CF-1CF7-47C7-AE63-8BAB47E4C151@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 25, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:59:33PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> On 1/25/07, Jim C. Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> decibel=# select box '((0,0),(2,2))' ~ point '(1,1)';
>>>> ERROR: operator does not exist: box ~ point
>>>
>>> I don't see a reason, although you can do it with polygon and not
>>> box.
>
> Seems like an old oversight.

Ok. If I ever get some time I'll submit a patch to bring everything
in-line (there's other missing operators as well).

>>> Also, I can't find the ~ operator defined for polygon in the
>>> documentation, am I missing something?
>
> ~ is deprecated, "contains" is preferentially spelled @> now.

Ok, I'll keep that in mind.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-26 21:15:46 Re: Recursive query syntax ambiguity
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-26 21:10:20 Re: VC2005 build and pthreads