From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extended protocol logging |
Date: | 2006-11-01 12:02:53 |
Message-ID: | A07478C6-65A2-433D-8045-992FCBA08722@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 1-Nov-06, at 6:18 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>>> These are logs from Beta 2.
>>
>> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different
>> behavior
>> from what it used to do.
>
> I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> in the protocol section, so interface designers know what will get
> logged from various protocol sequences.
I think some sort of examples are in order, or more consistency.
>
> That way JDBC people and others can interpret what their own
> interfaces
> should look like for 8.2
from a JDBC point of view we don't look at the logs in the API. I am
just debugging something
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | luis garcia | 2006-11-01 12:49:48 | ¿¿¿past chunk end??? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-11-01 12:01:48 | Re: Extended protocol logging |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-01 14:50:56 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging freezing |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-11-01 12:01:48 | Re: Extended protocol logging |