| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Dave Page' <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl service integration for WIN32 |
| Date: | 2004-06-17 01:00:13 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F4B1@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Dave Page writes:
> Looks OK to me at a quick glance. One thought though, whilst I like the
> idea of using service pause to do a SIGHUP from a convenience point of
> view, it's not exactly the expected behaviour and might leave the
> inexperienced user wondering why the server is still running normally.
> I'm on the fence regarding which way to to go with that though...
Likewise, I have no strong feelings either way. Apparently it is an accepted
paradigm.
Subconsciously, I must be against it, as I failed to pass a flag to enable
the Pause/SIGHUP operation. :-)
Amended patch attached.
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_ctl.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-17 01:36:33 | Re: Nested transactions |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2004-06-17 00:59:43 | Re: Nested transactions |