Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: "'''pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org' ' '" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 00:51:17
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F3BD@harris.memetrics.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Rather than hoping that we'll remember to decorate every select() call
> with this workaround, would it make sense to use a wrapper function?
> I'm loath to invent pg_select() but it might be cleaner than this.

We'd also need pg_recv() and pg_send(). Chances are it can happen with every
blocking socket call :-(

Cheers,
Claudio

--- 
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-26 00:57:19
Subject: Re: installdir patch for win32
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-26 00:45:53
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group