From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'''pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org' ' '" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: APC/socket fix (final?) |
Date: | 2004-03-26 00:51:17 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F3BD@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Rather than hoping that we'll remember to decorate every select() call
> with this workaround, would it make sense to use a wrapper function?
> I'm loath to invent pg_select() but it might be cleaner than this.
We'd also need pg_recv() and pg_send(). Chances are it can happen with every
blocking socket call :-(
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-26 00:57:19 | Re: installdir patch for win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-26 00:45:53 | Re: APC/socket fix (final?) |