Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> > implementations on various platforms? Are you suggesting we create a
> > separate regression output file for that platform?
> I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
> there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
> adding ORDER BY.
Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so:
Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest.
Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-03-10 22:56:07|
|Subject: fsync with sync, and Win32 unlink|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-03-08 19:26:55|
|Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status |