Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win3

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win3
Date: 2004-03-05 12:26:23
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F359@harris.memetrics.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Is there a case for forcing -i and ignoring the GUC setting 
> on Windows?
> Since we can't do Unix domain sockets there it would seem to 
> make sense.

FWIW, I agree. Not much point having a graceful failure, when it is the only
mode of operation. [At most, I say we just issue a warning if the GUC
variable is not set to true]

Claudio

--- 
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-03-05 12:35:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win3
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-03-05 12:01:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 build under MINGW

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group