Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-02-24 12:52:12
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F31D@harris.memetrics.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
> I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea 
> or someone else gets in first.

That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources.
winsup/cygwin/localtime.cc claims that it is in the public domain... needs a
closer look that I've given it, but might be a good starting point.

Cheers,
Claudio

--- 
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-24 12:58:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Previous:From: merino silvaDate: 2004-02-24 12:48:19
Subject: converting the DBMirror as peer-to-peer replicator

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-24 12:58:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Previous:From: Joerg HessdoerferDate: 2004-02-24 11:42:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group