Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Jan Wieck' <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4
Date: 2004-02-05 02:34:23
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F2DA@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches


> IIRC a separate "babysitter thread" just to handle message passing is
> exactly what Katie Ward did for UltraSQL ... the Win32 port done at
> NuSphere. Glad to see she was right about that.

Or Katie and I are both "wrong" :-P

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-02-05 02:59:59 Win32 regression tests
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-02-05 01:31:08 Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-02-05 04:57:37 Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SELECT
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-02-05 01:31:08 Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4