Re: pg_usleep

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_usleep
Date: 2003-12-31 02:33:09
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B0280B1@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

> patch + new file attached. Haven't tested on Windows, but
> should be fine.

Would be, except for a small typo (conditional operator has an additional :
instead of a ?). Also, we might want to change to SleepEx, depending on how
we eventually get signals implemented, but that's a story for another day.

This, + the pipe() patch from a couple days ago, means we can just about
tick off the "Problems with select()" item on the Win32 TODO list :-)

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-12-31 14:12:43 Re: pg_usleep
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-12-30 18:58:53 pg_usleep

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-31 02:40:41 Re: [PATCHES] Quoting of psql \d output
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-30 23:12:35 Solaris thread patch