Re: Signals on Win32 (yet again)

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: 'Magnus Hagander' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Signals on Win32 (yet again)
Date: 2003-12-21 02:54:05
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B02809E@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

> I definitly think we need to pick up the signals on a
> different thread, so the sending backend can get out fast.

FWIW, I concur.

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2003-12-21 05:25:20 Current Win32 port status
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-12-20 12:55:31 Re: Signals on Win32 (yet again)