Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: \df displaying volatility

From: Michael Glaesemann <michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com>
To: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: \df displaying volatility
Date: 2008-05-24 12:47:58
Message-ID: A02925AB-15BF-4488-AA94-988B7D0BEF5B@myyearbook.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 23, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility?  Maybe
>> limit it to \df+?
>> Ideally we would have a short header for the column so that it  
>> doesn't
>> take too much space, and specify the setting with a single letter.   
>> The
>> meaning of each letter we could display at the bottom of the table  
>> as a
>> footer (something we were going to do for \z too I think?)
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think it would be about time :) +1

I'd like to see the function comment as well in \df+. (And probably  
for most database objects that don't already show the comment.)

Michael Glaesemann
michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-24 14:00:45
Subject: Re: May Commitfest is done!
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-05-24 12:08:51
Subject: Updated patch (Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group