Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">="

From: "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">="
Date: 2001-11-12 13:53:58
Message-ID: 9sok6l$ek7$1@news.tht.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

In article <20011109145054(dot)H59285-100000(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>,
"Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:

> How many rows are in the table? Have you run vacuum analyze?

Sorry, that information was in the original post, but perhaps you missed
it:

In article <9shhnf$23ks$1(at)news(dot)tht(dot)net>, "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
wrote:

> We have a table which has approximately 400,000 rows. It has 17 columns,
> and 4 indexes. The primary key is a int4 (filled by a sequence),
> additionally we have two more int4 indexes and a timestamp index.

Yes, VACUUM ANALYZE gets run every 24 hours, and currently the table
grows by some 25K-40K rows per day. Could a factor be the time elapsed
between the VACUUM and the query?

--
Jeff Boes vox 616.226.9550
Database Engineer fax 616.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc. jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Fankhauser 2001-11-12 14:00:10 Re: to many connection
Previous Message Fabio Serra 2001-11-12 09:46:02 Which ODBC ?