Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)

From: "Artis Caune" <artis(dot)caune(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Laszlo Nagy" <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Date: 2008-09-24 10:52:44
Message-ID: 9e20d71e0809240352q3c7f1478qfa2a78aac95eb6f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is my opinion: I suspect that gjournal would be much slower than
> soft updates. Also gjournal is relatively new code, not very well
> tested.

In some cases it's much faster than SU, in other a bit slower. :)
gjournal is quiet "old" code, it's already more than two years around,
and very stable. Haven't seen any gjournal related crash.





-- 
regards,
Artis Caune

<----. CCNA
<----|====================
<----' didii FreeBSD

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Matthew WakelingDate: 2008-09-24 11:06:42
Subject: Re: Different execution plan
Previous:From: Claus GuttesenDate: 2008-09-24 10:39:23
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group