Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python

From: David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Date: 2009-05-29 11:47:16
Message-ID: 9d1f8d830905290447h65eb34a8sf12873b81bfa6b78@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> Does Python 3 have some sort of usable sandbox that would mean we could
> have a trusted plpython?

I brought this up last August [1]. Zope has a working sandbox that they
include in their distribution.

David Blewett

1.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/9d1f8d830808041008v50104fd8p6181d5ddce85a6a@mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-05-29 11:52:29 Re: libpq is not thread safe
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-05-29 11:31:49 Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python