Re: procpid?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: procpid?
Date: 2011-06-16 15:33:35
Message-ID: 9c61a43ed89612a7921ebf5d50ea28ef@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards
>> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better
>> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever).

> I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but
> "pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers to a
> database connection as a "session", i think.

No, this is clearly connections, not sessions. At least based on the items
in the postgresql.conf file, especially max_connections (probably one of the
items most closely associated with pg_stat_activity)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201106161132
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk36IjYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg8MgCgkMNw1o37cgmtJdYBAsGl7kz6
Q8sAoISFra0LyQjyKw3zcapWBdCLh2RV
=EYAc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-16 15:37:07 Re: [WIP] [Stream] Preview of pg_type changes
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-06-16 15:30:50 Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix