Re: Fragmentation project

From: "Gustavo Tonini" <gustavotonini(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fragmentation project
Date: 2007-04-25 20:46:04
Message-ID: 9c31dd0d0704251346w4039af2fp6de82ed6ee667852@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh,

On 4/23/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Gustavo,
>
> > > Oh, you're talking about distributing partitions across different nodes
> > > and parallelizing queries. No, we don't do that today.
> >
> > Yes.This is the goal. Well, I will try it. I'll send the project
> > reports to this list. Comments will be valuable. Desire me good
> > luck...
>
> You might join/look at the PgPoolII project, which is working on parallel
> query amoung other things.
>

The pgpool is an interesting approach to this, but I think that the
funcionality of inserting a record at a backend which will be
"redirectioned" to other and verifying deadlocks under network demands
in acquiring locks on the referenced records/tables in several hosts.
Then, IMO, this may be implemented inside dbms. How Marko wrote, this
is a non-trivial solution...
Really, It could be improved on pgpool to be a process coordinator,
but will need some changes in backend too.
This is a non trivial implementation, but there are several users
waiting for an effective solution for data distributing in a cluster.
These users actually buy commercial solutions or build themselves one.

Gustavo.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gustavo Tonini 2007-04-25 20:47:34 Re: Fragmentation project
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-25 20:38:30 Re: ECPG failure on BF member Vaquita (Windows Vista)