SCSI vs SATA

From: "jason(at)ohloh(dot)net" <jason(at)ohloh(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-03 22:13:15
Message-ID: 9C0858F5-0A48-4AF9-80FF-E4BA14F0F965@ohloh.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

We need to upgrade a postgres server. I'm not tied to these specific
alternatives, but I'm curious to get feedback on their general
qualities.

SCSI
dual xeon 5120, 8GB ECC
8*73GB SCSI 15k drives (PERC 5/i)
(dell poweredge 2900)

SATA
dual opteron 275, 8GB ECC
24*320GB SATA II 7.2k drives (2*12way 3ware cards)
(generic vendor)

Both boxes are about $8k running ubuntu. We're planning to setup with
raid10. Our main requirement is highest TPS (focused on a lot of
INSERTS).

Question: will 8*15k SCSI drives outperform 24*7K SATA II drives?

-jay

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Deucher 2007-04-03 22:17:20 Re: postgres 7.4 vs 8.x redux: query plans
Previous Message Craig A. James 2007-04-03 21:47:30 Re: [HACKERS] EXISTS optimization