Re: Two copies of every mail!

On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I thought what it would do is cause the list bot to attach a
> "Reply-To: list-address" header to each message it forwards to you
> (quite different from attaching same to your own outgoing messages).
> Since I don't particularly want that behavior, I've never experimented
> with it; so I might be wrong. What do you see in incoming pgsql-novice
> mail now that you've set the flag?

Right, this is what I meant and was expecting. This is what some other
lists do and I find it preferable for me since all parties are on the
list and I rarely see a reason to make a personal reply (I'm aware
there is great division on this issue, so I was really glad there seems
to be a preference for it).

Anyway, I don't see any difference after setting it. Here is a header
from the list (no reply-to in the header):

From: ...
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Compilation error on Solaris for Postgres-8.0.0
Date: January 27, 2005 9:57:06 AM EST
To: ...
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Return-Path: <pgsql-novice-owner+M12201(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Envelope-To: desoi probably at pgedit.com
Delivery-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:11:50 -0500
Received: from [207.173.200.128] (helo=hosting.commandprompt.com) ...
X-Original-To: pgsql-novice-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
In-Reply-To:
<FF851C7EEB75954F9BCFB5CA117AB1EC013FE33C(at)delta(dot)nulinkinc(dot)com>
References:
<FF851C7EEB75954F9BCFB5CA117AB1EC013FE33C(at)delta(dot)nulinkinc(dot)com>
Comments: ...
Message-Id: <19579.1106837826 at sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level:
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-novice
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-novice-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org

John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL