Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> AFAIK, that applies to parallel dumps of data (may help in --schema-only
>> dumps too), and what you are trying is for schema.
> Right, but one of the things it does is break the dump in to parts,
> and put them in a directory/file organization.
> Both are doing it for different reasons, but doing pretty much the
> same thing. But can the layout/organization of Joachim's patch can be
> made "human friendly" in the vein of Joel's vision?
I think they're fundamentally different things, because the previously
proposed patch is an extension of the machine-readable archive format,
and has to remain so because of the expectation that people will want
to use parallel restore with it. Joel is arguing for a split-up of
the text dump format.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-29 15:12:38|
|Subject: Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-29 14:59:32|
|Subject: Re: small table left outer join big table |