Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-23 13:29:58
Message-ID: 9973.1193146198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I'd suggest we have multiple checkpoints during the cycle. Checkpoint is
> a "patch queue blitz" where we stop developing and reduce the queue to
> nothing. Perhaps a two-week period where everybody helps reduce the
> queue, not just Tom and Bruce. Every outstanding patch gets told what
> they need to do in order to get it committed. FF is then just the last
> in a series of checkpoints. Suggest we do a checkpoint every 2 months.

I like this idea ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2007-10-23 13:50:22 Re: [PATCHES] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2007-10-23 13:25:47 Re: [PATCHES] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes