Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Implicit casts to text

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Implicit casts to text
Date: 2007-04-03 17:10:59
Message-ID: 9855.1175620259@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> FWIW, is the attached patch about what you had in mind?  (It probably only 
> covers "normal" types at the moment.)

Hm, I hadn't realized that it would take as little work as that ...
I have an itchy feeling that you missed something but I'm not sure
what.

One thing I had wanted to do is take out the existing functions and
pg_cast entries that are effectively just providing hard-wired
equivalents to this, but that's merely housekeeping.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-04-03 17:21:05
Subject: Re: notification payloads
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-03 17:06:38
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group