Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, your vote counts very much. What if I apply the patch, but mark
> the posix_advise() call in a NOT_USED macro block, so it will be ready
> for people to test, but will not be used until we are sure.
Sounds like a recipe for ensuring it never will be tested. What's
needed here is some actual tests, not preparation...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2006-02-14 05:06:04|
|Subject: Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-02-14 04:03:03|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup|