Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments
Date: 2006-02-14 04:33:31
Message-ID: 9855.1139891611@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, your vote counts very much.  What if I apply the patch, but mark
> the posix_advise() call in a NOT_USED macro block, so it will be ready
> for people to test, but will not be used until we are sure.

Sounds like a recipe for ensuring it never will be tested.  What's
needed here is some actual tests, not preparation...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-02-14 05:06:04
Subject: Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-14 04:03:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group