Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive
Date: 2010-02-18 11:27:29
Message-ID: 9837222c1002180327i40903da3s73ef60221b03b88e@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
2010/2/17 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> The server status patch for previous release had quite some changes, so
>> I'm not sure that four timers are still essential. Anyways, we can still
>> have four different timers and only one refresh rate.
>>
>> Dave, do you remember why you think four timers are essential?
>
> Because refreshing some panes is much more expensive than others. If
> you can come up with a better UI design, feel free, but I don't want
> to lose the ability to have different refresh rates for each pane.

Do we actually need different ones for each pane though, or do we just
need one for the log and one for the rest? (That might open up more
options for how to make such an UI..)


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-02-18 11:55:02
Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-02-17 17:27:31
Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group