Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: buildfarm breakage

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, zb <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage
Date: 2010-02-09 09:00:51
Message-ID: 9837222c1002090100y44aef29cyb820ca02d75ffa9e@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, February 9, 2010, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look at
>> it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition. :-)
>>
>> Looking at the portability header file it appears that isnan/isinf are only one
>> line defines, so it doesn't look like a major problem adding these. I will try
>> fixing this, but bear with me as I have to use the buildfarm for testing. I
>> don't have a Windows build environment.
>
> If you feel inclined, you can always use Amazon EC2 for Win32 testing:
>
> http://blog.hagander.net/archives/151-Testing-PostgreSQL-patches-on-Windows-using-Amazon-EC2.html
>

I actually brok the image that post talks about. But contact me on IM
if you want info about the new one I use andbhavent gotten around to
post abou yet.

/Magnus


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2010-02-09 09:21:06
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-02-09 08:54:15
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group