Re: pgsql: And another one

This kind of commit message is pretty much useless. If you want to do
a git blame/cvs annotate/whatever later, it gives exactly zero
information.

Isn't it better to just reuse the previous commit message? That will
also allow tools to group the commits together (if you're lucky, they
might even show up in git as a single commit)

(if you actually need this many different commits, of course :P)

//Magnus

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 18:10, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> And another one
>
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>    pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/include:
>        pgtypes_numeric.h (r1.16 -> r1.17)
>        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/include/pgtypes_numeric.h?r1=1.16&r2=1.17)
>    pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected:
>        compat_informix-sqlda.c (r1.7 -> r1.8)
>        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-sqlda.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8)
>        sql-sqlda.c (r1.7 -> r1.8)
>        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/sql-sqlda.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8)
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/