From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Date: | 2009-09-30 18:08:34 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c0909301108q76fa6c9ejcafdf0938479047c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 18:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... (and many of the more
>> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley
>> anyway).
>
> FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything
> except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches. I don't intend
> to touch any of those because there are other committers better
> qualified to review them. (I don't actually think we have anybody
> except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.)
I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
with the win32-only one for now?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-30 18:11:10 | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-30 18:02:43 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |