Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ver_svn.sh?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ver_svn.sh?
Date: 2009-09-29 12:39:31
Message-ID: 9837222c0909290539m329be080r35a6c57f932c1acf@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
2009/9/29 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> 2009/9/29 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> 2009/9/29 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>>>>> Hey Magnus,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason why pgadmin/ver_svn.sh exists? It looks like the
>>>>> same work is actually handled in pgadmin/Makefile.am.
>>>>
>>>> Seems that one was created for the attempt at doing cmake builds. It's
>>>> not used in the autotool builds.
>>>
>>> ahh, OK.
>>
>> What happened to that, btw? did we give up? .-)
>
> No, just haven't had time. I'm currently trying to make the svn
> version number stuff work on a git-svn repo. Which seems to work quite
> nicely BTW - all the benefits of git on your laptop, with svn on the
> server.

Yeah, I know. Been using it for a while ;) Though I haven't dared
commit through it. If you set it up to do that as well, stick some
instructions on the wiki?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-09-29 12:41:56
Subject: Re: ver_svn.sh?
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-09-29 12:37:14
Subject: Re: ver_svn.sh?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group