Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date: 2009-08-10 14:33:17
Message-ID: 9837222c0908100733q6d0fb42ne27f5c7d80be4ce2@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
>> patch for that).
>
>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?
>
> 8.2 as well, no?

8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-08-10 14:45:14
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-08-10 14:27:21
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group