On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 15:45, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 16:14, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I'm not really insisting on a redesign. I'm talking about the places
>>> where the code author appears not to have understood that ERROR means
>>> FATAL, because the code keeps plugging on after it anyway. As far as
>>> I can see, using ERROR at lines 3630, 3657, 3674, and 3693 is just
>>> plain bogus, and changing to LOG there requires no other fixing.
>> But. I'll look into cleaning those up for HEAD anyway, but due to lack
>> of reports I think we should skip backpatch. Reasonable?
> Fair enough.
Here's what I came up with. Seems ok?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2009-08-05 13:02:13|
|Subject: Re: status of ECPG patches?|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-08-05 12:08:02|
|Subject: status of ECPG patches?|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2009-08-05 13:12:57|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets
for man page building This switches|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2009-08-05 11:42:20|
|Subject: pgsql: Fixed copyright notice.|