On Saturday, July 25, 2009, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> When you run a file with psql -1/--single-transaction, and a command fails,
> you get bombarded with
> ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of
> transaction block
> for the rest of the file.
That would certainly be useful.
Personally I'd prefer it to default to that always, and not just in
-1, but that would break way too many old things I'm afraid...
> Shouldn't -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP or some variant by default?
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-07-25 13:15:39|
|Subject: Re: Shouldn't psql -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP?|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-07-25 13:00:18|
|Subject: Shouldn't psql -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP?|