Hello Bruce

On Oct 8,  5:40pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have removed the data/base/*/pg_version file because it was never
> used.  We had removed the 'version' functions long ago, but
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Does this mean that the following from the FAQ is wrong?

	3.25) How do I tell what PostgreSQL version I am running?

	From psql, type select version();

If so then this question should probably be changed to point users to the
PG_VERSION file.

Just a thought

-- 
Sincerely,

Jazzman (a.k.a. Justin Hickey)  e-mail: jhickey(at)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th
High Performance Computing Center
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC)
Bangkok, Thailand
==================================================================
People who think they know everything are very irritating to those
of us who do.  ---Anonymous

Jazz and Trek Rule!!!
==================================================================

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success at 1998-10-08 21:40:29 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) at 1998-10-09 02:46:07 from Bruce Momjian
• Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) at 1998-10-09 10:05:48 from Jan Wieck

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jan Wieck	Date: 1998-10-09 10:05:48
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
Previous:	From: Jan Wieck	Date: 1998-10-09 09:00:21
	Subject: PL patches (one more)