Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)

From: "Justin Hickey" <jhickey(at)impact1(dot)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
Date: 1998-10-09 09:07:23
Message-ID: 9810090907.ZM14542@impact1.hpcc.nectec.or.th
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Bruce

On Oct 8, 5:40pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have removed the data/base/*/pg_version file because it was never
> used. We had removed the 'version' functions long ago, but
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Does this mean that the following from the FAQ is wrong?

3.25) How do I tell what PostgreSQL version I am running?

From psql, type select version();

If so then this question should probably be changed to point users to the
PG_VERSION file.

Just a thought

--
Sincerely,

Jazzman (a.k.a. Justin Hickey) e-mail: jhickey(at)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th
High Performance Computing Center
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC)
Bangkok, Thailand
==================================================================
People who think they know everything are very irritating to those
of us who do. ---Anonymous

Jazz and Trek Rule!!!
==================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-09 10:05:48 Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-09 09:00:21 PL patches (one more)