Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [JDBC] Re: JDBC buggy in 7.1beta3

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stu Coates <stu_coates(at)mail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Re: JDBC buggy in 7.1beta3
Date: 2001-01-26 09:33:00
Message-ID: 980501580.3a71444c85b85@webmail.retep.org.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-jdbc
Quoting Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>:

> This is no longer a problem in 7.1.  The bug here was the same one
> introduced by the wrong version of Gunner's bytearray pooling patch
> being applied.  It was fixed in current sources by Peter commenting out
> the bytearray pooling.

That's what I thought. I think theres several bugs that are being confused as 
being the same at the moment.

Peter
> 
> thanks,
> --Barry
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Anyone fixing this bug?
> > 
> > > I reported a JDBC bug in the 7.1 beta1 release back in December and
> notice that the same bug is still present in the current beta 3 sources.
>  The problem relates to nested cursors failing and is quite simple to
> reproduce.  A simple test case can be found at:
> > >
> > > http://www.twospuds.com/pg7-1b3-jdbc-bug.tar.gz
> > >
> > > The 7.0.2 JDBC drivers work fine against the 7.1b3 backend, with a
> little tweaking for "long" rows.
> > >
> > > Peter (Mount) did acknowledge the bug but I have not heard anything
> on the list since then.  Is anyone looking at it?  Come to think of it,
> I haven't seen anything on the lists [HACKERS mainly] from Peter for a
> while.
> > >
> > > Stu.
> > > --
> > > Stu Coates
> > > Chelmsford, England U.K.
> > > ICQ:146628
> > > http://www.stucoates.com/
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> > > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
> > >
> > 
> > --
> >   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
> >   pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
> >   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
> >   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
> 19026
> 



-- 
Peter Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-26 14:45:25
Subject: Re: select fails on indexed varchars.
Previous:From: Peter T MountDate: 2001-01-26 09:31:13
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 2001-01-26 09:39:57
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] JDBC PreparedStatement.setMaxRows() affects other objectsinstantiated from this class and it's parent class
Previous:From: Peter T MountDate: 2001-01-26 09:31:13
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group