| From: | darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com (Darren King) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] INT2OID, etc. |
| Date: | 1998-02-27 14:45:24 |
| Message-ID: | 9802271445.AA69762@ceodev |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Brett McCormick wrote:
> >
> > Can we have all the constants put in pg_type? In the implementation
> > of my perl PL language, some types I care about aren't defined so I
> > must define them myself, which seems dangerous (should they ever
> > change)
> >
> > On Fri, 27 February 1998, at 12:15:21, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> >
> > > I like second way (and so - we should copy pg_type to ~pgsql/include or
> > > something like this) but it would be nice if you support more
> > > general 1st way too.
>
> We should do this.
Is there anything to prevent someone from deleting that function and
then recreating it? If that happens, it will then have a different oid.
darrenk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-27 15:00:43 | Re: [HACKERS] INT2OID, etc. |
| Previous Message | Meskes, Michael | 1998-02-27 13:52:26 | RE: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues |