Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Chahine Hamila" <chahine(dot)hamila(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
Date: 2006-08-27 19:44:16
Message-ID: 9776.1156707856@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 8/27/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> ... or the pgcluster group could check the hook list posted by the GORDA
>> project guys.  In fact IIRC that patch was committed already, without
>> much discussion?

> I thought the GORDA patch got turned down because there was no
> communication between replication providers.

Exactly; we asked for some evidence that these particular hook
definitions were generally useful.  So it seems like a joint
pgcluster/GORDA/Slony proposal would go over a lot better.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2006-08-27 23:31:06
Subject: Interval month, week -> day
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-27 19:18:14
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group