Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Introduce timeout handling framework

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce timeout handling framework
Date: 2012-07-17 16:31:37
Message-ID: 9763.1342542697@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Perhaps I'm asking a naive question, but wouldn't it be easier if
> people had the opportunity to use the buildfarm without actually
> committing something?

Why?  The whole point of the buildfarm is to break, as it were.
I don't see the value of adding more bureaucracy in order to keep
it from breaking.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-07-17 18:07:28
Subject: pgsql: Remove recently added PL/Perl encoding tests
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-07-17 16:07:57
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce timeout handling framework

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group