Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Perhaps I'm asking a naive question, but wouldn't it be easier if
> people had the opportunity to use the buildfarm without actually
> committing something?
Why? The whole point of the buildfarm is to break, as it were.
I don't see the value of adding more bureaucracy in order to keep
it from breaking.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-07-17 18:07:28|
|Subject: pgsql: Remove recently added PL/Perl encoding tests|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-07-17 16:07:57|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce timeout handling framework|