Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: code coverage patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michelle Caisse <Michelle(dot)Caisse(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Date: 2008-08-28 14:24:10
Message-ID: 9632.1219933450@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Korry Douglas wrote:
>> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way 
>> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

> I think only bison supports that directive.

We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no?  It's been years since
I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain
yacc.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-08-28 14:51:42
Subject: Re: What happend to equality_oper()
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-08-28 14:00:21
Subject: Re: code coverage patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group