Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: json api WIP patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Date: 2013-02-01 00:38:15
Message-ID: 9619BB27-99C3-43F4-B060-E42293D2553A@justatheory.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Ada or no, its use in plpgsql would render that a seriously bad idea.

I assumed that its use in function params would be the main reason not to use it.

David

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gavin FlowerDate: 2013-02-01 00:41:11
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-02-01 00:32:25
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group