| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <me(at)alternize(dot)com> <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: help with query: advanced ORDER BY... |
| Date: | 2006-01-15 10:59:24 |
| Message-ID: | 95C07B27-2318-4409-8C59-3BB0F8ABF436@myrealbox.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Jan 15, 2006, at 19:53 , <me(at)alternize(dot)com> <me(at)alternize(dot)com> wrote:
>> Something you may consider doing is creating a view that masks the
>> screen_number in those cases, something like
>>
>> create view schedule_public_view as
>> select theater_id
>> , screen_date
>> , screen_time
>> , case when no_screen_number then 0 else screen_number end as
>> screen_number
>> , movie_name
>> from schedules;
>
> wouldn't this be the same problem: pgsql not using the index for
> screen_number anymore?
That may be. Only way to be sure is to try it. (And I'm not
knowledgeable enough to know for sure.)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Hofmann | 2006-01-15 18:19:04 | Help with query |
| Previous Message | me | 2006-01-15 10:53:03 | Re: help with query: advanced ORDER BY... |